Thursday, 2 February 2012


 The quality of test construction depends largely on the part of the classroom teacher. Every classroom teacher is interested to know how far and wide he/she can facilitate; orient and guide his/her students with the knowledge, ideas, abilities, skills, and attitudes that he/she wishes to build up to achieve his/her teaching objectives and make his/her students responsive to the changing needs of society. He/she is in the best position to ascertain the strength and weaknesses and the needs of his/her students and the goal he/she wants to achieve
          The classroom teacher usually gives the following types of test (item formats) in the classroom: multiple choice, true or false, matching type, completion, cloze, and essay.

MULTIPLE CHOICE TESTS
         
          The multiple choice type of test is a form of assessment in which students are asked to select the correct or best answer out of the choices from the list. In this kind of test, an item consists of two parts: the stem and the set of options or alternatives. It requires the students to select from the options that will make the stem complete or correct. All incorrect or less appropriate responses are called distracters or foils.
         
Example (DIRECT QUESTION)
          Who is the president of the Philippines after EDSA 1?
Example (INCOMPLETE STATEMENT)
          The president of the Philippines after EDSA 1 is?
          a. Pres. Gloria Arroyo                    c. Pres. Joseph Estrada
          b. Pres. Corazon Aquino               d. Pres. Fidel Ramos.
A stem may also be presented in a form of mathematical equation.
Example:
          In the equation 2x+3=4, solve for x.
          a. 4                d. 1.5
          b. 10              e. 8
          c. 0.5
The given options are the possible answers that the examinees can choose from, with the correct answer called key. The minimum number of options is three while the maximum is 5.

Advantages of Multiple choice tests
          1. It has great versatility in measuring objectives from the level of rote memorization to the most complex level.
          2. It often requires less time to administer than tests requiring written responses.
          3. Because this style of test does not require a teacher to interpret the answer, test takers are graded purely on the selection, thus creating a lower likelihood of teacher bias in the results.
          4. Because student writing is minimized, the teacher can cover a substantial amount of course material in relatively short time.
          5. Scoring is objective since only little interpretation is needed to count the number of correct responses.
          6. Teachers can construct options that require students to discriminate among them. These items vary in the degree of correctness.
          7. The effectiveness of guessing is largely reduced since there are more options.
          8. Items are more amenable to item analysis, and this can be used to detect areas of students weaknesses, evidence of item ambiguity, item difficulty, and the extent o which the item can measure individual differences.

Disadvantages of multiple choice tests
          1. This type of test is more consuming in terms of looking for options that are more plausible.
          2. Multiple choice tests are ambiguous. Failing to interpret the question as the test-maker intended can result in an incorrect response, even if the test-takers response is potentially valid. The term multiple guess has been used to describe the scenario because test-takers may attempt to guess, rather determine the correct answer.
          3. In a multiple choice test, a student who is incapable of answering a particular question can simply select a random answer and still have a chance of receiving a mark for it. It is a common practice that students with no time left to give all the remaining questions, random answers in the hope that they will get at least some of them right.
          4. Test-naïve students complain of more than one defensible correct answer.

Suggestions for writing multiple choice tests
          1. The stem should introduce what is expected of the examinee. The essence of the problem should be in the stem. A poor stem leaves the students dealing with four possible answers, hence making the examinees anxious as what to do. All the options should measure the same objective; that is, if the stem calls for a name of a person, all the choices should be the names of persons.
          2. Avoid repetition of words in the option. The stem should be written so that the key words are incorporated in the stem and will not have to be repeated in each option. This will save reading time on the part of the student.
          3. When the incomplete statement format is used, the options should come at an end of the statement. All test items should present the problem to the student as early and clearly as possible.
          4. Avoid specific determiners. Multiple choice test items should not contain clues on what the correct answer is. One clue is option length; the longest length is usually the right one.
          5. Use vocabulary suited to the maturity of the students.
          6. Stems and options should be stated positively whenever possible. Elementary grade pupils find negatives confusing. For older students, a negative in either the stem or option, but not both, is permissible. If the word “NOT” is used in the stem, it should be underlined to ascertain that it is not overlooked.
          7. Options should be plausible and homogeneous. It is useless to include distracters that no examinees will choose.
          8. Items should have a defensible correct or best option. To avoid this pitfall, the teacher should examine each option to make sure it is either the most defensible or clearly the wrong one. It is important to justify the reasons for incorrect options as it is to be able to defend the correct ones.
          9. Avoid items that measure opinions. All opinions are equally defensible.
          10. Vary the placement of correct options.
          11. Avoid overlapping options. A multiple choice test should only have ONE correct option. Avoid having options like;
          a. lady                         c. woman
          b. lass                         d. girl
          12. Use “ none of the above” as an option only if there’s an absolute right answer.
          13. Avoid asking students for trivial information like middle initials, specific dates or years, spellings, among others, from the options.
          EXAMPLE:
          a. Pres. Corazon A. Aquino                      c. Pres. Corazon C. Aquino
          b. Pres. Corazon B. Aquino                      d. Pres. Corazon D. Aquino
          14. Whenever possible, arrange options in a logical order of magnitude, temporal sequence and so on.
          15. The stem should be clear and grammatically correct and should contain elements common in each option. Multiple choice tests obey the STANDARD ENGLISH rules of punctuation and grammar.
          16. Use four or five options.

TYPES OF MUTIPLE CHOICE TESTS

1. STIMULUS MATERIAL – STEM – OPTIONS
2. STEM-OPTIONS
Example:
          Which of the following serves as an example of formative evaluation?
          a. diagnostic test                c. periodical test
          b. entrance test                  d. short quizzes
3. NEGATIVE STEM
Example:
          The following are examples of an adjective EXCEPT:
          a. albeit       c. gargantuan
          b. august     d. titanic
4.  BEST ANSWER
Example:
          Since there is no clear cut or well-defined policies on observing privacy in all instances, the teacher is simply required to be:
          a. anonymous    c. secretive
          b. carefree         d. sensitive
 5.CONTAINED OPTIONS
Example:
Identify the error in the sentence.
          My parents was in Manila to assist my sister enroll in college.              No error
                      a.        b.                         c.                            d.                                  e.
6. CORRECT ANSWER
Example :
          What is the summer capital of the Philippines?
          a. Baguio City            c. Davao City
          b. Cebu City               d. Olongapo City
7. GROUP OPTIONS
Example:
          Write---
   A. If the item is a simple sentence
   B.If the item is a compound sentence
   C.If the item is a complex sentence
   D.If the item is a phrase
   E. If the item is a clause
8. MORSE VARIETY
Example:
          Write---
A. If W affects X, but X affects Y, but Y affects Z
B. If W does not affect X, but X does not affect Y, but Y does not affect Z
c. If W affects X, but X does not affect Y, but Y affects Z
D. If W does not affect X, but X affects Y, but Y does not affect Z


Checklist for Writing Multiple Choice Test
                              FACTORS
YES
1. Are the item and main problem in the stem clearly presented?

2. Has the item been cast so that there is no repetition of key words or
phrases in each option?

3. Do the option come at the end of the stem

4. Have the responses been arranged in some systematic functions
such as alphabetically or by the length of options?

5. Are all distracters plausible?

6. Have all irrelevant clues been avoided?

7. Are the correct answers randomly assigned throughout the test with
approximately equal frequency?

8. Is there only one correct or best answer?

9. Has “all of the above” been avoided?

10. Has “ none of the above” option been used sparingly or only when appropriate?

11. Have the overlapping options been avoided?

12.  Have negative statements been avoided? If used, has the negative been
underlined or written in capital letters?


 Quality True-False Items

True-false items (also called binary-choice items) are utilized to assess a student's ability to recognize the accuracy of a declarative statement. Due to the nature of this type of assessment, true-false statements are particularly useful in measuring a student's ability to differentiate between forced-choice statements (such as true-false, yes-no, correct-incorrect, etc.). As such, true-false questions are well suited for measuring knowledge, comprehensive, and application levels of understanding (although creative, well-designed questions may also assess higher-order learning objectives). A quality true-false item is generally classified as an objective assessment technique as it will only have one correct answer.

Binary items Test (True or False)

          This type of test requires the examinee to recognize and mark an item as true or false. Other possible options are agree or disagree, yes or no, valid or invalid, fact or opinion, and cause or effect.

Advantages of True or False Test 

1. Item sampling
Because the true or false tests/items and answers tend to be short, teachers can examine students on more materials than they can with any other type of test. The true or false (T-F) test can help ensure an adequate sample of items when a great deal of subject matter must be covered.
2. Ease of construction
Teachers can construct terms of this type by lifting statements from the book and rewording some of them to make false items. However, this must be avoided since items may become ambiguous. The said practice, although takes less time to construct, likewise promotes rote memorization.
3. Ease of scoring
Scoring is relatively mechanical as student has to only agree or disagree with the item. The difficulty lies in the penmanship of the student as some would write “T” in longhand and be read or appear as “F”. This can be remedied by requiring students to write in print, write the full word, or shade a circle correspondingly.

Disadvantages of True or False Test 

1. Emphasis on Rote Memorization

Modern educational practices tend to lessen the emphasis on rote memorization except in gaining pre-requisite knowledge for more complex skills. It is better for the student to apply particular skills after just having attained them. For example, how a student can apply the rules of multiplication is better than multiplication per second. The increasing complexity of life demands comprehension, analysis, synthesis, application. And evaluation from a student.
If examinations only test the skills of memorization, students may oversimplify questions that require complex answers. It demands that the teacher be creative when casting-F test in such a way that more complex objectives can be measured.

2. Dependence of absolute judgment
The T-F test presumes a dichotomous world, where things are either a falsity or truth and the possibility of intermediate values are not easily admitted. Although most facts are not entirely true or false and still require qualification, it is unfair to ask the students to guess at the teacher’s criteria for the evaluation of the truth or falsity of any statement.

3. Likelihood of Guessing
          This type of test allows a high degree of guessing. Statistically, an examinee has always the chance of obtaining 50% correct answers. Students uncertain of their answer can always guess and hope to answer correctly.

Pointers for writing True or False Test 

          1. Construct items that measure important objectives. Requiring students to respond to new situations is one way to increase the thought-content of T-F tests.
          2. Avoid using specific determiners. Specific determiners give clues to correct answers. These include sweeping generalizations like always, never, all and impossible.
          3. Avoid using trick questions.
          4. Limit each statement to the point that is being tested. Avoid equivocal items.
          5. Avoid excess use of negative words and phrases.
          6. Approximately half of the statements should be false. Because it is easier to construct true item. The teachers inadvertently include more statements that are true. The chance of getting correct answer by guessing is higher since students who are in doubt would tend to mark the item as true
          7. Avoid qualitative terms like best, some, many, and several.

Types of True or False Test

1. Simple True or False
          Write TRUE if the statement is correct and FALSE if otherwise.
2. Modified True or False
          Write TRUE if the statement is valid and FALSE if otherwise. If the statement is     FALSE, underline words that(s) make it wrong.
3. True or False with correction
          Write TRUE if the statement is correct and FALSE if otherwise. If the statement is false, rewrite or change the statement to make it right.
4. Cluster True or False
          Circle T if the statement is TRUE and F if it is FALSE.
5. True or False with Options
6. Fact or Opinion
 Matching-type Test is similar to the multiple-choice test. In this kind of test, the examinee associates an item in one column with a choice in the second column. The items in the first column are called premises and the answers in the second column are the responses.
Column A                                 Column B
_____1. Person who performs mysterious            A. Facilitator
              tasks no one understands                             B. Trainer
_____2. Person who provides schooling               C.Instructional Designer
for children                                        D. Meeting Organizer
_____3. Person who enables a group                            E. Teacher
to find solutions
_____4. Person who instructs adults
in a classroom

A matching type test format provides a change of pace, particularly for self-check and review activities. Many instructional designers employ them in quizzes and tests too. They are effective when you need to measure the learner’s ability to identify the relationship or association between similar items. They are also very a very efficient approach to testing and can provide an excellent objective measurement.

There are 2 types of Matching-type Test:
1. Perfect Matchinghappens when an option is the only answer to one of the items in column A.

Column A                        Column B
                             Provinces                    Tourist Destinations
1. Albay                     a. Lunete Park
2. Bohol                     b. Mt. Mayon
3. Banaue                  c. Chocolate Hills
4. Pangasinan            d.Rice Terraces
5. Manila                   e. Hundred Islands
     f. Pagsanjan Falls
     g. Malolos Church

2. Imperfect Matchinghappens when an option is the answer to more than one item in the column.
Column A                        Column B
      Tourist Destinations           Provinces              
1. Lunete Park                 a. Albay      
2. Mines View Park        b. Manila
3. Chocolate Hills             c. Banaue
4. Camp John Hay d. Bohol
5. Intramuros                  e. Pangasinan
          f . Baguio
          g. Palawan

A. Advantages of the Matching-type Test

1. The matching- type test is simple to construct and score. It is well suited in measuring associations. Like a multiple choice test, it presents the student with questions and alternatives.
2. It reduces the effect of guessing, although the chance of guessing increases as the student progresses in answering items. This, however, is easily remedied by adding more options.

B. Disadvantages of the Matching-type Test

1. It tends to ask students to associate trivial information. Unfortunately, most matching-type tests emphasize memorization, although it is, impossible to construct items that measure more complex cognitive skills.
2. In case of commercial answer sheets, matching items can accommodate no more than five options.

C. Pointers on Writing Matching-type Tests
1. If possible, the response list should consist of short phrases, single words, or numbers.
2. Use homogenous options and items.
3. Have more options than the given items. Initially, a matching-item tests decreases the student’s tendencies to guess but as the students progress in answering the test, the guessing tendencies increase. This can be avoided by increasing the options.
4. Arrange the options and items alphabetically, numerically, or magnitudinally. This is one way to help the examinees since they can maximize their time by not searching for the correct answers, especially if there are many options.
5. Limit the number of items within each set. Ideally, the minimum is five items and the maximum is ten per set.
6. Place the shorter response in column B. This time-saving practice allows the students to read the longer items first in column A and then search quickly through the shorter options to locate the correct alternative.
7. Provide complete directions. Directions should stipulate whether options can be used only once or more than once. They should also instruct the students on how to respond. The instructions should also clarify what column A and B are about.
8. Place the list of options on the same page as the list of items. Time is wasted if students have to flip pages to search through all options to locate the correct ones. Additionally, some students may overlook that there are still some options on the next page.
9. Avoid specific determiners and trivial information that can help the students find the correct response without any effort on their part. The use of “ none of the above” as an option is recommended if it is the only correct answer.
10. Clearly explain the basis on which the match is to be made.

D. Suggestions for Measuring Complex Objectives with Matching-type tests
1. Match examples with terminologies. Perhaps this is the most direct and simplest method of increasing the thought content of matching tests provided that the example has not yet been taught before.
2. Use novel pictorial materials.
 Completion Test Items

          The completion item requires the student to answer a question or to finish an incomplete statement by filling in a blank with the correct word or phrase.

Advantages in using completion items
1. can provide a wide sampling of content
2. can efficiently measure lower levels of cognitive ability
3. can minimize guessing as compared to multiple-choice or true-false items
4. can usually provide a reliable measure of student achievement or ability
5. have a low level of complexity which typically measures the type of text being conducted.
6. Eliminates guessing for it simply requires recall.
7. Improves item sampling and takes less time to read and answer than multiple-choice tests.

Disadvantages of the Completion Test
1. Difficult to score.
2. Typically measures rote memory and are restricted to short words.
3. Usually restricted to short words
4. Items tend to measure recall of specific facts, names, places and events that rarely measure more complex outcomes.

Limitations in using completion items
1. are difficult to construct so that the desired response is clearly indicated
2. have difficulty measuring learning objectives requiring more than simple recall of information
3. can often include more irrelevant clues than do other item types
4. are more time consuming to score when compared to multiple-choice or true-false items
5. are more difficult to score since more than one answer may have to be considered correct if the item was not properly prepared
6. avoid specific determiners.
7. do not omit so many words from the statement the intended meaning is lost.
8. avoid grammatical or other clues to the correct response.

Suggestions for writing completion test items
1. Omit only significant words from the statement. 
2. Be sure there is only one correct response.
3. Make the blanks of equal length.
4. When possible, delete words at the end of the statement after the student has been presented a clearly defined problem.
5. Avoid lifting statements directly from the text, lecture or other sources.
6. Write items that clearly imply the type of response desired.
7. Limit the required response to a single word or phrase.
Cloze Deletion Test
          The Cloze test measures students' comprehension abilities by giving them a short text, with blanks where some of the words should be, and asking them to fill in the blanks. This version of the test resembles the directions to a computer game, describing the game's rules. This task requires students to build an internal representation of the text, to put the words together in a meaningful way, so that they will be able to interpolate what words belong in the blanks.
Theoretic Background of Cloze Tests

          Initially, the cloze tests, which were introduced by Taylor (1953), were used only to assess the readability of texts in the reader’s native language. It originates from Gestalt psychology, which holds that integrity of human consciousness is the most intrinsic feature of psychology. Therefore, it is a sub-consciously-motivated tendency to fill up the empty when one is observing an object or picture. After Taylor, the cloze tests came to be used in L2 testing, but it did not get popular until 1970s when overall competence was gaining attention.

          The idea of overall competence can be traced back to the Unitary Competence hypothesis proposed by Oller (1979); before that time tests were devised to measure performance or recognition of separate sounds, specific grammatical features, or vocabulary items. What Oller said, in brief, was that language proficiency is indivisible, that tests only differ in their effectiveness at measuring this one factor, and that the elaborate apparatus of dimensions and tests used by the psychometrics could be replaced by one test which would directly tap the single indivisible faculty of overall proficiency, one of the most well-known being cloze tests, in which every nth word has been deleted. Among the deleted words, lexical ones take up 65 percent to 75 percent and functional ones, 25 percent to 35 percent.
There are at least five main types of cloze tests available to language teachers:
&νβσπ;fixed-rate deletion
&νβσπ;selective deletion (also known as the rational cloze)
&νβσπ;multiple-choice cloze
&νβσπ;cloze elide and the C-test (Ikeguchi 1995; Weir 1990; Klein-Braley and Raatz 1984).
 Essay questions are designed to provide the students the opportunity to answer questions in their own words (Ornstein, 1990). They can be used in assessing the student’s skill in analyzing, synthesizing, evaluating, thinking logically, solving problems, and hypothesizing. According to Gronlund and Linn (1990), there are 12 complex learning outcomes that can be measured effectively with essay items.

A.    Advantages/Disadvantages of Essay Test

Advantages

1. Essay gives students freedom to respond within broad limits. Essay examinations allow students to express their ideas with relatively few restraints.
2. Guessing is eliminated. Essay involves recall and there are no options to select from. The student is expected to supply rather than select the proper response.
3. Essay items are practical for testing a small number of students. However, as the number of students increases the advantage of essay tests decrease.
4. Essay tests reduce assembling time. Less time is required for typing mimeography and assembling. If only a few questions are asked, the teacher can just write them on the board.
5. They can measure divergent thinking. Divergent thinking is indicated by unconventional, creative, relatively free responses. Because they allow great freedom in answering the opportunity to obtain unusual responses is increased.
6. Essay questions give an opportunity to assess students’ abilities and critical thinking skills.
7. Essay items are an effective way to measure higher level cognitive objectives. They are unique in measuring students' ability to select content, organize and integrate it, and present it in logical prose.
8. Students are given an opportunity to provide their authentic experience as the essay questions are usually given with the purpose to give students an opportunity to check their capacity to make decisions rather than choose from existing variants.
9. They present a more realistic task to the student. In real life, questions will not be presented in a multiple-choice format, but will require students to organize and communicate their thoughts.

Disadvantages

1. Essays are difficult to score objectively because students have greater freedom of expression. Also, long, complex essays are more difficult to score than shorter, more limited ones.
2. Extended essays measure only the limited aspects of student knowledge. Because extended responses required time to write, only a few questions can be given to the students. Thus essays tests sample limited content and are not always a fair measure of what the student actually knows. This problem is less serious when responses are limited and the number of items is increased.
3. Essay questions are time-consuming for teacher and students. Students often spend much time answering only one or two extended essay questions which may severely limit sampling their knowledge. Teachers, in the meantime, also devote much time reading lengthy responses. However, if time limits are kept constant, Coffman (1972) has shown that objectivity is improved by increasing the number of items than by allowing greater freedom in responding to fewer items.
4. Essays eliminate guessing but not bluffing. Poorly prepared students desperately attempt to get a passing grade by answering even if their responses are not related to the questions asked.
5. Most essays require a little more than rote memory. In practice, very few essays require originality and most emphasize lengthy enumeration of memorized facts or trends.
6. Essay test place a premium on writing. Students can read much more rapidly than they can write. Much of the time allotted to answering an essay question is devoted to the mechanics of writing and there is relatively little time to think about the content. On more objectively scored tests, little time is spent in writing and more time is used in thinking about responses. If the teacher does not attempt to measure writing skills, a multiple test will probably provide more information per unit of time than with an essay.
7. Essay questions usually require extended answers. That is why it is impossible to ask too many questions. There are about three or four questions students can cover at the test. Students’ competence in the subject cannot be checked in the full volume.
8. It is difficult to check and assess tests where the essay questions were used because of their length.
9. The length and complexity of the answer, as well as the standards for responding, can lead to reliability problems in scoring.

B.     Use of Essay Tests

There are varied ideas for and against essay testing. Below are the favorable comments.

1. Raises the quality of writing.
2. Teaches students to organize outline and summarize assignments rather than simple look for facts, dates and details expected in T-F or multiple choice tests.

Likewise, there are arguments against essay tests.

1. Essay test do not allow students to revise and rewrite their work since time is limited.
2. The teachers’ over-attention to details can destroy the themes of essays.

Situations that suggest the Use of essay questions

1. If the test objective specify that students have to write, recall or supply information, an essay examination may be necessary. Objectives that suggest extended student responses also suggest the use of essays.
2. When the class size is small, the teacher can afford to spend more time reading essay responses. Reading extended responses for large classes may prove to be excessively time consuming.
3. Since multiple-choice tests are difficult to construct but easy to score, they are considered more practical when the test can be reused. If a test can be used only once an essay examination may be more convenient than a multiple-choice one.

          Some teachers use essay questions as teaching tools throughout the course by making them the focus of class discussions. Students are given the questions prior to the day of the discussion so they can prepare answers. The class discussion is an exercise in exploring the ways the questions can be answered. Students thereby have an opportunity to practice their thinking skills and also become familiar with the type of questions favored by the teacher. Teachers who use this method report that it not only improves student performance on essay exams, but it also raises the quality of class discussions.

C.     Pointers on Writing Essay Test

          Essays are a popular form of assessment because they can be used to assess a range of skills as well as subject knowledge. Writing essays under exam conditions is quite different to 'normal' essay writing, however. Generally, you won't have access to source material or notes; you have only limited time to reflect on the question and plan your response; and there is no time for redrafting or major editing.

The difficulty in scoring essay rests on the teacher’s failure to precisely specify what they want their students to do. Some teachers are not sure of what they want; others know but fail to communicate this to students. In either, the ambiguity of the essay questions and the lack of scoring standards reduce the effectiveness of essay tests. The following suggestions should be useful in writing essay questions:

1. Specify limitations. Tell the students the length of the desired response and the weight each question will be given when determining the scores. This includes the time to be spent on each item, the approximate number of words per item, maximum points per item, and maximum amount of space to be devoted for each item.
2. Structure the task. The instructions should clearly the task. Most essay questions are so vague that the instructor’s intent is lost.
3. Make each item relatively short and increase the number of items. The more items there are, the greater chance there is of the sampling of knowledge.
4. Give all the students the same essay questions if the content is relevant. Sometimes, teachers give the students the opportunity to deal with one or two items from a set of essay questions.
5. Ask questions in a direct manner. Avoid deviousness and pedanticism when framing questions.

D.    Suggestion for Rating Essay Test

Essay test may be scored in four ways: analytic or point system, universal or holistic approach, sorting method, and demerits.

The analytic or point system is useful in scoring a large number of limited response essay questions. Teachers using this method decide how much weight each question will have and inform students of the number of points necessary for a perfect score on each question. The student’s total score is the sum of the points awarded to each answer.

The universal or holistic approach gives the general impression to all the answer to the questions. The student’s total score is based on the overall quality of all the answers to all the questions.

The sorting method is more appropriate than the point system for rating longer essays. Rather than examining every sentence or main idea to determine how many points the students should receive, the best papers are placed on one pile, the worst on the other and the intermediates in between them. After the papers are initially sorted, they are reread to ensure homogeneity. Maximizing differences between or among groups and reducing the differences within the groups should be the goal of the teacher.

Teachers using demerits deduct points for inconsistencies in the students’ answer. This usually happens when the essay responses are expanded. As the students further discuss their answers, they become more prone to committing contradicting statements.

In the grading of essay responses, one must observe the following suggestions:
1. Remove names from papers before grading.
2. Read and evaluate each student’s answer to the same question before going to the next.
3. Keep the scores of previously read items out of sight when evaluating remaining questions.
4. Decide on a policy for dealing with irrelevant responses.
5. If possible, reread or have other teachers read the papers before returning them to the students.
6. Check the scoring key against actual responses.
7. Be consistent when grading.
8.     The mechanics of expression should be judged separately from what the students writes.
9. If possible, have two independent readings of the test and use the average as the final score.
10. Provide comments and correct errors.
11. Set realistic standards.

No comments:

Post a Comment